
Images from the patient’s cardiac PET study: (A) Perfusion images, (B) Gated images, and (C) Myocardial blood flow. View the complete case.
The majority of participants in the February 2026 cardiac PET case poll said the most appropriate interpretation of the imaging study was multivessel coronary artery disease. The patient, an 87-year-old man, presented with chest pain. He had an unremarkable physical exam; an LVEF of 60%; and a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and peripheral artery disease. Do you agree with the poll participants?
The case, titled Utility of PET Myocardial Blood Flow in a Patient with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease, reveals the correct answer to the poll question and explains the tools used to guide their interpretation.
Shekhar Vohra, MD, Phillip Lim, MD, Marija Petrovic, MD, PhD, Vikram Agarwal, MD, MPH, and Krishna K. Patel, MD, MS, FASNC, of Mount Sinai Morningside at Mount Sinai Fuster Hospital in New York contributed this case. ASNC’s archive of cardiac PET cases is available in the Cardiac PET Resource Center.
Article Type
News & Announcements
Category
Education
Related Posts
CMS Releases Final Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Hospital Outpatient Payment Rates and Policies for 2027
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released the 2027…
Declining LV Function During Cancer Therapy: What Would You Do Next?
For the October 2026 cardiac PET case poll, ASNC asked voters to…
ASNC Industry Forum Brings Leaders Together to Brainstorm Advancing Nuclear Cardiology
Strengthening nuclear cardiology’s position in the increasingly competitive cardiovascular imaging landscape was…


